×Proposal · Confidential

The operating
system for
security work.

Paraxia connects the tools, teams and AI agents Concentrix already relies on, carrying work from the first finding through approved action and verified resolution, with the right owner and approver in every region.

Less time coordinatingOwners and approvals found, not chased
Faster resolutionFrom first signal to verified close
A complete recordEvidence, decisions and outcomes, on file
Your tools and AI agents Organizational context Your teams Workflows
Identity provider
Endpoint
Vulnerability scanner
Cloud
Service desk
AI agents
Ownership
Policy
Structure
Regions
Exceptions
THThreat hunt lead
RBRegional BISO
PRPrivacy office
IRCInsider risk and compliance
GLGlobal legal
Threat hunt
Incident response
Agent governance
Insider risk
0
Shared recordReady
hello@paraxia.ioPrepared for Concentrix · October 2026
The problem×

Security work crosses teams and regions

Your tools identify the problem. Your people still carry the work.

At Concentrix scale, security work crosses systems, regions and approval chains. Teams spend hours finding evidence, working out who owns the next step, chasing the right approver and confirming that actions were completed.

This week · security work in flight · four teamsDay 14 open
MonTueWedThuFri
By hand
Threat huntHunt finding on a compromised server
Hunt flags the server
Who has access? Who owns it?
Who approves isolating it?
Contained? Never confirmed
Insider riskPerson of interest across six systems
Name surfaces in a Telegram channel
Evidence pulled by hand
Waiting on HR and global legal
Was the account disabled?
Incident responseIncident with personal data in three regions
Alert in one region
Which regional BISO approves?
Privacy office not yet told
Who signed off?
Site inspectionFinding on a delivery floor
Inspection logs a finding
Site, IT or account team: who fixes it?
Client attestation due, no proof on file
?Who owns the next step?
?Who can approve it here?
?Was it actually done?
Finding evidence · determining ownership · chasing decisions · confirming completion: by hand, across teams
The solution×

What Paraxia does

One place to move security work forward.

Paraxia connects evidence with organizational context, routes work to the right people, carries out approved actions and verifies the result in your source systems.

Security team · Monday

3 decisions need you. 3 programs are dark.

Since you were last here →
Ask Paraxia across your workspace
ProgramsSquares show days a finding fired. Bars show how findings closed.7 workflows running across 4 programs
Identity and access
2workflows+1 added
SSMTWTF
30d: 8 acted · 2 noise

Connect source
Insider risk
1workflow+1 added
SSMTWTF
30d: 3 acted · 0 noise

Connect source
AI security and governance
0workflows+1 added
SSMTWTF
Just added

Not watched yet. Needs your AI platform logs.

Connect source
Vulnerability and exposure
3workflows+1 added
SSMTWTF
30d: 26 acted · 3 noise

Connect source
Data protection
1workflow+1 added
SSMTWTF
30d: 4 acted · 0 noise

Connect source
Compliance and audit readiness
0workflows+1 added
SSMTWTF
Just added

Not watched yet. Needs your control evidence sources.

Connect source
Third party and vendor risk
0workflows+1 added
SSMTWTF
Just added

Not watched yet. Needs your vendor inventory.

Connect source
Coverage
4 of 7 programs watched →
01
ConnectReads evidence across the tools you already run and joins it into one case.
02
UnderstandApplies your structure, policies and ownership to find the right owner and approver.
03
ApproveA named approver signs off, holds, or asks for more. Nothing moves before that.
04
ExecuteCarries out the approved action through your tools, exactly as signed.
05
VerifyRechecks the result in the source system and records it with the case.
Organizational context, ownership and evidence persist throughoutNothing runs unattended.
Workflows×

How a workflow gets built

Your playbooks,
built into workflows.

Start from the playbook your team already follows, or a verified template. Paraxia drafts the steps. Your team connects the systems, names the owners and approvers, and tests it on past cases before it goes live.

01
Start from a playbookUpload your own, or pick a verified template from the library.
02
Draft the stepsParaxia turns each line of the playbook into a step you can edit.
03
Connect the systemsChoose what each step reads from and acts through. Read-only to start.
04
Name the ownersSuggested from your org context and identity provider. Your team confirms.
05
Set the approvalsWho signs before anything changes, by region and policy.
06
Test, then go liveTime today's process as the baseline, replay past cases, then switch it on.
Workflows/Hunt finding to verified containmentDraft
Start from
Your playbookHunt finding response.pdf
Verified templateThreat hunt library
StepSystemsOwner · suggestedApproval
1Confirm the finding on the affected server
EDRSIEM
THThreat hunter
Not needed · read-only
2Find who has access and who owns it in this region
Identity providerCMDB
TLThreat hunt lead
Not needed · read-only
3Contain the server, with the regional owner's OK
EDR
ITIT operations
Regional BISO, then hunt lead
4Verify containment, then close the case
EDRCase record
TLThreat hunt lead
Not needed · rechecked at source
Baseline: 12 recent cases timed
Replayed on 20 past cases · nothing changed
Go live
Your playbook or a verified template, fitted to your stack and your orgNothing runs until your team switches it on.
Insider threat hunting×

Insider threat hunting, up close

One investigation. Every handoff accounted for.

What your team needs
01
Catch it earlyHunts that surface a sold credential or a latent insider before the fraud, not after it.
02
The story, not the snapshotMonths of VPN, endpoint and open-source activity built into one profile.
03
The right view for each roleInvestigators see the logs. HR and legal see the summary. Personal details stay scoped.
04
An accountable approverA named person in the right jurisdiction signs before anything changes.
05
Evidence that holds upChain of custody on every item, from first signal to a package for counsel.

Where a client hosts the desktop, the case is built from what Concentrix can see: VPN, identity, email and open sources.

Workflows/Insider investigation/INV-2041New
INV-2041 · Hunt: shared or sold credentials · 02:15

One login, two countries, then a bulk export: j.rivera

▲ HighInsider riskThreat hunt
Oct 3Account name offered in a Telegram channelOpen source
02:14VPN session from a new device, outside working hoursVPN
02:15Second session on the same login from another countryVPN
02:311.2 GB moved to a personal cloud driveCloud drive
INV-2041/ProfileAgents working
Sources read for this case0 queries
VPN 90 daysIdentity provider 3Endpoint 41Open sources 1Client-hosted desktop · not visible
Travelruled out
Approved device swapruled out
Shared login for convenienceruled out
Paraxia proposes
Escalate the account and review the device
Owner: insider risk analyst. Approver: regional BISO.
INV-2041/People and handoverScoped access
TH
Threat hunterInvestigator
Logs · personal details withheld
HR
HR partnerReviewer
Summary · no raw logsReviewed
GL
Global legalReviewer
Plain-language summaryReviewed
RB
Regional BISOApprover
Next
02:46
Paraxianow
INV-2041 needs your signatureEscalate the account and review the device. Signs under the policy for this region.
Regional BISO · signing
Escalate the account and review the device
Insider risk analyst · proposed
You · in jurisdiction, local policy
Approve and sign Hold
INV-2041/ChangeExecuting
Change · identity providerSigned 02:46
Accountactive→disabled
Signed-in sessions2→0
Deviceenrolled→isolated

Paraxia makes this change in the identity provider and endpoint management. Your team approves it first.

INV-2041/RecordExecuted and verified
Checks at the source0 of 3
Account disabled in the identity provider
Device isolated in endpoint management
Chain of custody intact: source, time and handler on every item
Case closedINV-2041 · 02:52 · evidence package ready for counsel
01HuntA scheduled hunt flags one login in two countries at once
HuntProfileHR + LegalApproverIT + ParaxiaCase closed
Paraxia working→Proposal ready→Human approval→Executed and verified
Shaped to your stack and approval structure in scoping
Organizational context×

Context-aware routing

The right work. The right owner. The right approval.

Across every country you operate in, the same finding can need a different owner and approver depending on where it lands. Paraxia learns how Concentrix works from your own cases, your team confirms what it learned, and ownership changes in your identity provider are flagged.

Security team/Context
What Paraxia knows about how you work
StructureEvery AI agent has a named owner in the business unit that deployed it.
PolicyAgents that touch EU personal data need a privacy review before their access changes.
Learned from AGT-118 · needs your OKSupport desk agents read ticket history by design. Read access alone is not a finding.
Keep itEditNot trueKept · used for routing
Ownership changes in your identity provider are flagged for review.
Incoming work · Agents held to their purposeAI agent now reading customer recordsSame finding, four different parts of the organization.
AI platformsIdentityApp audit logHRIS
Corporate · North AmericaStandard policy
OwnerSupport platform lead
ApproverData owner
InformedSecurity lead
Regional operations · EuropeEU personal data in scope
OwnerRegional IT lead
ApproverData protection officer
Review firstPrivacy · Legal
Engineering · Asia PacificSource code in scope
OwnerRegional BISO
ApproverEngineering director
InformedRepository owner
New acquisition · Latin AmericaNo owner on file
OwnerOwner missingBackup owner assigned

Flagged to the security leader. Work does not wait in an inbox nobody reads.

Structure · geography · policy · ownership · exceptionsA missing owner is flagged, never skipped
Governance×

Chain of custody

One shared process.
Access appropriate to every role.

Everyone on the case works from the same record and sees only what their role allows. Investigators see the evidence, HR and Legal see a plain-language summary, approvers see status and decisions. Every item keeps its source, time and handler, and every view is logged.

THIR
Threat hunt · Insider riskInvestigators
Technical record
INV-2041/EvidenceViewing as investigator
Evidence · 4 sourcesSource
02:14VPN session from a new device, outside working hours
VPN
02:16PowerShell history: 41 events on the device
Endpoint
02:311.2 GB moved to a personal cloud drive
Cloud drive
Prior 90 days6 earlier sessions replayed, pattern isolated
VPN
Personal details withheld
HRGL
HR partner · Global legalReviewers
Plain-language summary
INV-2041/SummaryViewing as Global legal
Summary · for reviewOwner
What happenedCompany data moved to a personal drive outside working hours
Analyst
Timeline02:14 to 02:52, eight steps in plain language
Paraxia
DecisionEscalate the account and review the device
Regional BISO
Raw logs withheld
Investigator notes withheld
RB
Regional BISOApprover
Status and decisions
INV-2041/DecisionsViewing as approver
Status · this caseState
OwnerInsider risk analyst
Active
DecisionEscalate the account and review the device
Signed 02:46
ChangeAccount disabled, device isolated
Verified
CustodySource, time and handler on every item
Intact
LogSummary viewed by Global legal 10:42 · nothing changed
Recorded
Chain of custody · INV-2041Every view and decision is logged
02:31Evidence collected from the cloud drive, read-only
02:46Regional BISO signed the escalation
10:42Global legal viewed the plain-language summary
11:05Evidence package exported for counsel · custody intact
Evidence keeps its source, time and handler · access is scoped by role · every view and decision is loggedSame case. Role-appropriate view.
Business value×

Measured against your current process

Less time coordinating. More work completed.

The hours your teams get back are tracked as each case closes, counted from the case record against your own before-period and priced at your own rates. Report on them whenever you need to. Nothing is modeled.

ParaxiaSecurity team · Value record · every workflow, every team

What the teams got back, and what it was worth.

Live · updated as each case closes
MeasureCounted fromBaselineSet in scopingSince go-live, week by weekAt baselineFurthest aheadThis week
Hours finding owners and approvalsPer case, from first signal to every signature
Time against the caseBaseline
Approval wait timeFrom request to decision, by region
Approval logBaseline
Case completion timeFrom first signal to verified close
Case recordBaseline
Review time for legal, HR and privacyPer case, by reviewing team
Time against the caseBaseline
Cases surfaced and disposedBy team, against your before-period
Case recordBaseline
ReportedLive view for each teamWeekly digestLeadership summary, on demandExport for budget reviews
Measuredcounted from the recordBaselineyour own before-periodEstimatedyour team's figures, such as a loaded hourly rate, never presented as measured
Baseline documented before the first workflow runsHours returned → cost avoided at your rates · faster resolution → shorter exposure
Expansion×

One deployment, more programs

Start with one program. Expand across security.

Each new program builds on the connected systems, organizational context and approvals already in place. Your own playbooks become the next workflows, and the value shows up across teams, not just in one.

Program 1Start here
Threat hunting and insider riskHunt findings and investigations carried to a verified close, with chain of custody.
BuildsSourcesOwnersApprovalsRecord
Program 2Add next
Incident and breach responseWho has access, who approves in each region, and when the privacy office is told.
ReusesOwnershipApproval chains
Program 3Add next
Site assessments and inspectionsFindings from the floor routed to the site, IT or account team, and closed with proof.
ReusesOwnersThe record
Program 4Add next
Client audits and attestationsEvidence for PCI DSS, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 requests, already on the record.
ReusesThe recordDecisions
Program 5Add next
Fraud investigationsThe same evidence trail and custody log, run by your fraud investigators.
ReusesSourcesCustody log
Program 6Add next
Identity and agent governanceEvery AI agent treated like an employee: a named owner and scoped access.
ReusesIdentityOwnership
Same deployment, every program
Connected systemsOrganizational contextApprovalsShared record
One agreement. Each next program uses what is already connected.Add the next at your pace
Adoption×

Security requirements first

Designed to work within your security requirements.

Begin with a defined workflow, approved sources and clear access boundaries, hosted in your environment or ours with data kept in region. Execution expands only where you authorize it, behind the signatures you set.

ReadRead-only discoveryApproved sources, read access. Nothing changes.
ProposeControlled first workflowProposals go to the approvers you name.
ExecuteApproved executionSpecific actions, behind signatures, rechecked at source.
ExpandAdditional programsSame boundaries, same approvers, same record.
Settings/Approval rulesWho signs before Paraxia acts, and how many signatures it takesProgram: All programs
When Paraxia wants toWho signsSignaturesPre-approved
Insider riskOpen a case and notify the ownerNothing changes in any systemInsider risk analystAllowed
AI agentsNarrow or revoke an AI agent's accessAgents only, no peopleAgent owner then Security leadNot yet
Threat huntIsolate a compromised serverCan be reversedThreat hunt lead then Regional BISONot yet
LegalShare evidence outside the companyCounsel, regulators, law enforcementCase owner then Global legalNever
On this action
Fresh sign-in to signProtects against a stolen session
Two different signersAlways, on this action
Page the deputy after 8 hoursIf nobody signs in time
Your environment or ours · data kept in region · nothing runs unattendedArchitecture, hosting, data handling, vendor risk review: technical appendix
Next steps×

Where to start

Prove the value with one workflow.

We define the first workflow with your threat hunt and insider risk teams, document the current baseline, set the approval and security requirements, and build toward a measured evaluation.

01ScopeThreat hunt and insider risk together: the workflow, the sources, owners and approvers by region
02Data protection briefingWhat the agents can and cannot see, with data kept in region, before anything connects
03Baseline and deployToday's hours on owners and approvals, then the first workflow, read-only first
04Measure outcomesHours returned, approval wait and cases surfaced, against the baseline
05Agree on expansionThe next program, chosen on the evidence
Bring to the scoping call
  • 1The workflow that crosses the most teams today, and where it stalls
  • 2Who signs at each step, and how that changes by region
  • 3Who owns your AI agents today, and what they can reach
  • 4How the work is measured now, so the hours have a before
KM
Kaila MathisCo-founder, CEO · kaila@paraxia.io
TR
Tarun RameshCo-founder, CTO · tarun@paraxia.io
Your tools identify what needs to happen. Paraxia makes sure the work moves forward. Connect evidence across your stack. Find the right owners. Get the right approvals. Execute approved actions. Verify what changed.
hello@paraxia.ioParaxia × Concentrix · Confidential · 2026
← → navigate · R replay · P presenter · ⌘P print